Skip to content

Featured

Linearising Lipschitz Maps

Tags: banach-space-theory

Consider the following question: Given a Lipschitz map ff between two Banach spaces XX and YY with certain properties, can we construct a linear map with the same properties? In this article, we shall demonsrate that in the case of Lipschitz embeddings, the answer is positive, subject to a condition on YY. Most of the results here are adapted from Topics in Banach Space Theory by Albiac and Kalton, although some of the arguments have been simplified somewhat.

Definition. Let XX and YY be Banach spaces and take AXA\subset X open. A map f:XYf:X\rightarrow Y is said to be Gâteaux differentiable at a point xAx\in A if there exists a bounded linear map T:XYT:X\rightarrow Y such that for every uXu\in X,

T(u)=limt0f(x+ut)f(x)tT(u) = \lim_{t\rightarrow 0}{\frac{f(x+ut)-f(x)}{t}}

We say that ff is Fréchet differentiable at xAx\in A if the above limit holds uniformly for uBXu\in B_X.

Idea. Suppose f:XYf:X\rightarrow Y is a Lipschitz embedding. Then if x0Xx_0\in X and t>0t>0,

Lip(f1)tuf(x0+tu)f(x0)Lip(f)tu,\Lip(f^{-1})\norm{tu} \leq \norm{f(x_0+tu)-f(x_0)} \leq \Lip(f)\norm{tu},

so if ff is Gâteaux differentiable at x0x_0 then by dividing through by tt and taking limits we obtain that Df(x0):XYD_f(x_0):X\rightarrow Y is a linear embedding, as desired.

Before we begin, we need to generalise the notion of the Lebesgue integral to functions whose range is a Banach space, rather than the real or complex numbers. This is done with the Bochner Integral. We shall not discuss the definition here as it is defined using simple functions, more or less the same as in the real case. However, one key difference is that the Radon-Nikodym theorem does not hold in general here, motivating us to define the following:

Definition. Let XX be any Banach space and (E,A,μ)(E, \mathcal{A}, \mu) be a measure space. We say that f:EXf:E\rightarrow X is strongly measurable or Bochner measurable if there exists a measurable function g:EXg:E\rightarrow X such that gg has separable range and g=fg=f almost everywhere.

Definition. A Banach space XX is said to have the Radon Nikodym property (RNP) if for every bounded linear map T:L1[0,1]XT:L_1[0,1]\rightarrow X, there is a bounded and strongly measurable function g:[0,1]Xg:[0,1]\rightarrow X such that T(f)=01f(t)g(t)dtT(f)=\int_{0}^{1}f(t)g(t)dt for fL1[0,1]f\in L_1[0,1].

The following results regarding the Bochner integral are important, though the proofs do not add much to the current context so may be skipped if desired.

Theorem. A Banach space XX has the RNP if and only if every Lipschitz map from [0,1][0,1] into XX is differentiable almost everywhere.

Proof. Suppose every Lipschitz map from [0,1][0,1] into XX is differentiable almost everywhere, and let T:L1[0,1]XT:L_1[0,1]\rightarrow X be a bounded linear map. Define ff from [0,1][0,1] into XX by f(t)=T(χ[0,t])f(t) = T(\chi_{[0,t]}). By assumption, ff' exists almost everywhere on [0,1][0,1]; furthermore, since ff is Lipschitz, ff' is bounded and f[0,1]f'[0,1] is separable, i.e. ff' is strongly measurable. For every xXx^*\in X^*, we can use the FTC and linearity of xx^* to obtain

x(T(χ[0,t]))=x(f(t))=0t(x(f(s)))ds=x(0tf(s)ds)=x(0tf(s)χ[0,t](s)sds)x^*(T(\chi_{[0,t]})) = x^*(f(t)) = \int_0^t (x^*(f(s)))'ds = x^*\left(\int_0^t f'(s)ds\right) = x^*\left(\int_0^tf'(s)\chi_{[0,t]}(s)sds\right)

so T(g)=0tf(s)g(t)dsT(g) = \int_0^tf'(s)g(t)ds for every gg of the form χ[0,t]\chi_{[0,t]}, t[0,1]t\in [0,1]. But from these we can obtain all the indicator functions of intervals, and so by linearity and continuity we get the result for every gL1[0,1]g\in L_1[0,1].

For the converse, suppose XX has the RNP. Let S\S be the linear span of all indicator functions on intervals, and let f:[0,1]Xf:[0,1]\rightarrow X be a Lipschitz map. Then define T:SXT:\S\rightarrow X by

T(i=1Naiχ(si1,si])=i=1Nai(f(si)f(si1)).T\left(\sum_{i=1}^{N}a_i\chi_{(s_{i-1},s_i]}\right) = \sum_{i=1}^{N}a_i(f(s_i)-f(s_{i-1})).

We may assume the intervals in this sum are disjoint, giving use well-definedness. TT is clearly a bounded linear operator, so by density of SS in L1[0,1]L_1[0,1], we may extend it to a bounded linear operator on the whole space. By assumption, we can find a strongly measurable bounded function g:[0,1]Xg:[0,1]\rightarrow X such that

f(v)f(u)vu=T(χ(u,v])vu=1vuuvg(s)ds,\frac{f(v)-f(u)}{v-u} = \frac{T(\chi(u,v])}{v-u} = \frac{1}{v-u}\int_u^vg(s)ds,

so by the Lebesgue differentiation theorem f=gf'=g exists almost everywhere on [0,1][0,1]. \square

Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem for the Bochner Integral. Let XX be a Banach space and f:RnXf:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow X be a strongly measurable function such that for all compact KRnK\subset\mathbb{R}^n, Kf(ξ)dξ<\int_{K}\norm{f(\xi)}d\xi < \infty. Then the set of Lebesgue points of ff has full measure, or in other words, limδ0+δnξδf(x+ξ)f(x)dξ\lim_{\delta\rightarrow 0^+}\delta^{-n}\int_{\xi\leq\delta}\norm{f(x+\xi)-f(x)}d\xi for almost every xRnx\in\mathbb{R}^n.

Proof. Since ff is strongly measurable, we may assume that ff has separable range. Choose ZZ dense in f(Rn)f(\R^n). Now by the Lebesgue differentiation theorem for real valued functions, for each fixed zZz\in Z,

limδ0+δnξδf(x+ξ)zdξ=f(x)z\lim_{\delta\rightarrow 0^+}\delta^{-n}\int_{\xi\leq\delta}\norm{f(x+\xi)-z}d\xi = \norm{f(x) - z}

except on a null set, say AzRnA_z\subset\R^n. But then setting A=zAzA=\bigcup_zA_z (which is also null), we obtain the above for every zZz\in Z. Finally, using the triangle inequality,

limδ0+δnξδf(x+ξ)f(x)dξ(1+Vn)f(x)z\lim_{\delta\rightarrow 0^+}\delta^{-n}\int_{\xi\leq\delta}\norm{f(x+\xi)-f(x)}d\xi \leq (1+V_n)\norm{f(x) - z}

where VnV_n is the volume of the nn dimensional unit ball. Taking the infimum of zZz\in Z gives the result. \square

Now we come back to a special case of our problem.

Finite Dimensional Rademacher Theorem. Let f:EYf:E\rightarrow Y be a Lipschitz map from a finite dimensional normed space EE to a Banach space YY with the RNP. Then ff is Fréchet differentiable almost everywhere.

Proof. (sketch) Since YY has the RNP, we can use the above characterisation of this to see that for each direction uEu\in E, u(x)\partial_u(x) exists on a set of full measure Ωu\Omega_u. Extend this to a bounded and strongly measurable function S()(u)S(\cdot)(u) on EE. We can take a sequence of mollifications gng_n of ff such that Dgn(x)(u)S(x)(u)D_{g_n}(x)(u)\rightarrow S(x)(u) for uEu\in E at Lebesgue points xLux\in L_u, which is of full measure by the Lebesgue differentiation theorem. Choosing GEG\subset E as a dense set of rational coordinates in EE, E=uG(ΩuLu)E'=\bigcap_{u\in G}(\Omega_u\cap L_u) is of full measure, and S(x)()GS(x)(\cdot)|_G is linear for xEx\in E', because so is Dgn(x)()D_{g_n}(x)(\cdot). We can extend this to the desired derivative T(x)()T(x)(\cdot) of ff for xEx\in E'. \square

We would like to apply something similar to the above to obtain our result; remember that all we need for an embedding is a single point of differentiability. However, we cannot use the Lebesgue measure as our space may be infinite dimensional: Therefore we must introduce an alternative notion of a null set for arbitrary Banach spaces.

Definition. We say that a Borel set AA in a Banach space XX is Haar-null if there is a probability measure μ\mu on B(X)\mathcal{B}(X) such that μ(x+A)=0\mu(x+A)=0 for every xXx\in X.

Notice that in this definition, μ(A)=1\mu(A) = 1.

Lemma. Suppose AA is a subset of a separable Banach space XX, and EE is a finite dimensional subspace of XX such that λ((x+A)E)=0\lambda((x+A)\cap E) = 0 for all xXx\in X. Then AA is Haar-null.

Proof. Choose a probability measure μ\mu on XX, supported on EE, such that for BXB\subset X, μ(B)=0\mu(B) = 0 if and only if λ(BE)=0\lambda(B\cap E) = 0 (we could do this by, for example, setting μ(B)=BEϕ(ξ)dλ(ξ)\mu(B) = \int_{B\cap E}\phi(\xi)d\lambda(\xi) for a suitable strictly positive function ϕ\phi). Then since λ((x+A)E)=0\lambda((x+A)\cap E) = 0 for all xXx\in X, μ(x+A)=0\mu(x+A)=0 for all xXx\in X as required. \square

Lemma. If AnA_n is a sequence of Haar-null sets in a separable Banach space XX, then nAn\bigcup_nA_n is Haar-null.

Proof. Choose a sequence of probability measures μn\mu_n on AnA_n such that for each nn, μn(x+An)=0\mu_n(x+A_n) = 0 for all xXx\in X. Define a probability measure μ\mu on XX by

μ(B)=n=12nμn(B).\mu(B) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} 2^{-n}\mu_n(B).

Note that we obtain countable additivity by absolute convergence of the sum (so we can rearrange the terms), and clearly μ(X)1\mu(X) 1. Clearly, μ(x+A)=0\mu(x+A) = 0 for all xXx\in X, giving the result. \square

Infinite Dimensional Rademacher Theorem. Let f:XYf:X\rightarrow Y be a Lipschitz map from a separable Banach space XX to a Banach space YY with the RNP. Then ff is Gâteaux differentiable except on a Haar-null set.

Proof. Take an increasing sequence of finite dimensional spaces (En)n=1(E_n)_{n=1}^{\infty} whose union is dense in XX. Denote by DnD_n the set of points xEnx\in E_n at which fEnf|_{E_n} is differentiable with derivative Tn(x)T_n(x), and let An=XDnA_n=X\setminus D_n. Then if xXx\in X, (x+An)En(x+A_n)\cap E_n has Lebesgue measure zero by Rademacher’s theorem, so by apply the preceding two lemmas, nAn\bigcup_{n}A_n is Haar-null. Choose x0nDnx_0\in \bigcap_nD_n. Then for each nn, Tn(x0):EnYT_n(x_0):E_n\rightarrow Y is a linear operator bounded by Lip(f)\Lip(f) extending Tn1(x0)T_{n-1}(x_0). Hence by continuity we can define a linear operator T(x0):XYT(x_0):X\rightarrow Y, again bounded by Lip(f)\Lip(f), which we can check is the Gâteaux derivative of ff at x0x_0. Indeed, if uXu\in X and ε>0\varepsilon>0, then choosing vnEnv\in \bigcup_nE_n such that uvLip(f)1ε/3\norm{u-v} \leq \Lip(f)^{-1}\varepsilon/3 we obtain

f(x+ut)f(x)tT(u)f(x+vt)f(x)tT(v)+2Lip(f)uv<ε\norm{\frac{f(x+ut)-f(x)}{t} - T(u)} \leq \norm{\frac{f(x+vt)-f(x)}{t} - T(v)} + 2\Lip(f)\norm{u-v} < \varepsilon

provided tt is sufficiently small. \square

Note that this is no longer uniform in the direction uu, so we lose Fréchet differentiability. Indeed, it would be too much to hope for that, since f:22f:\ell_2\rightarrow\ell_2, f(x1,x2,...)=(x1,x2,...)f(x_1, x_2, ...) = (\abs{x_1}, \abs{x_2}, ...) is nowhere Fréchet differentiable.

From this we deduce that since XX is not Haar-null, we must have at least one point of differentiability, giving the following result.

Corollary. Let f:XYf:X\rightarrow Y be a Lipschitz embedding from a separable Banach space into a Banach space YY with the RNP. Then XX is linearly isomorphic to a subspace of YY.

All Posts